<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Lync Guy&#039;s Blog (Formerly OCSGuy)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ocsguy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ocsguy.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:23:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deploying an Edge Server with Lync by Dug</title>
		<link>http://ocsguy.com/2010/11/21/deploying-an-edge-server-with-lync/#comment-3275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocsguy.com/?p=604#comment-3275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sorry in the 3rd paragraph it was meant to say:

&quot;....{lync., meet., dialin}.domain.co.uk going to my front end.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry in the 3rd paragraph it was meant to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;.{lync., meet., dialin}.domain.co.uk going to my front end.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deploying an Edge Server with Lync by Dug</title>
		<link>http://ocsguy.com/2010/11/21/deploying-an-edge-server-with-lync/#comment-3274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocsguy.com/?p=604#comment-3274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kevin. I hope you don&#039;t mind giving me a few mins of your time, but i&#039;m kinda pulling my hair out! I&#039;m in the process of testing a Lync deployment without a reverse proxy. I&#039;ve had success in giving the front end two IPs and have both the internal and external iis sites on 80 and 443. I also have an edge. running the remote connectivity analyser I get an invalid MRAS URI. I have read through all the comments regarding this, specifically:

&quot;Have you created the public SRV record for your SIP domain?
It should be _sip._tls.domain.com pointing to your edge servers public name (i.e. sip.domain.com) on port 443. Without that record things will not connect.&quot;

Now this is where i get a little hazy. What exactly does public mean? Do you mean my ISP&#039;s DNS panel, or the public side / zone of my network? In my ISP&#039;s DNS i have sip.domain.co.uk (which is used for sip, a/v, webconf) going to my edge, and .domain.co.uk going to my front end. On my ISP&#039;s panel i can only add an &#039;A&#039; record or &#039;cname&#039;. there is no option for an SRV entry - and certainly not one for a port number!

We only want the software for external online meetings which do currently work, except it will not allow the remote guest to share their desktop with the internal user (although vice-versa works!!) I assume this is something to do with the subsequent communication between the two through the sip/edge, after the initial handshake through the front end!

I hope my post doesn&#039;t sound to dumb/basic, but i&#039;m specifically stuck regarding the external SRV record. Many thanks,
dug.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin. I hope you don&#8217;t mind giving me a few mins of your time, but i&#8217;m kinda pulling my hair out! I&#8217;m in the process of testing a Lync deployment without a reverse proxy. I&#8217;ve had success in giving the front end two IPs and have both the internal and external iis sites on 80 and 443. I also have an edge. running the remote connectivity analyser I get an invalid MRAS URI. I have read through all the comments regarding this, specifically:</p>
<p>&#8220;Have you created the public SRV record for your SIP domain?<br />
It should be _sip._tls.domain.com pointing to your edge servers public name (i.e. sip.domain.com) on port 443. Without that record things will not connect.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now this is where i get a little hazy. What exactly does public mean? Do you mean my ISP&#8217;s DNS panel, or the public side / zone of my network? In my ISP&#8217;s DNS i have sip.domain.co.uk (which is used for sip, a/v, webconf) going to my edge, and .domain.co.uk going to my front end. On my ISP&#8217;s panel i can only add an &#8216;A&#8217; record or &#8216;cname&#8217;. there is no option for an SRV entry &#8211; and certainly not one for a port number!</p>
<p>We only want the software for external online meetings which do currently work, except it will not allow the remote guest to share their desktop with the internal user (although vice-versa works!!) I assume this is something to do with the subsequent communication between the two through the sip/edge, after the initial handshake through the front end!</p>
<p>I hope my post doesn&#8217;t sound to dumb/basic, but i&#8217;m specifically stuck regarding the external SRV record. Many thanks,<br />
dug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Links by Brian Osley</title>
		<link>http://ocsguy.com/links/#comment-3260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Osley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocsguy.com/?page_id=217#comment-3260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Kevin,

I posted this on the Technet forum for Presence and IM in Lync but thought I would run it by you to see if you&#039;ve ever heard of it happening to anyone else.  Thanks for any insight you can provide.

I have a very odd situation I am looking for some guidance on.  We have PIC licensing for Lync and federation is established with Yahoo and Live Messenger and it works fine for the most part.  Our Lync users have outside customers they communicate with over IM.  These customers mostly use Yahoo Messenger.  When the outside customers (I&#039;ll refer to them as Yahoo users from this point forward) are logged into Yahoo Messenger on their desktops, messages and presence flow both ways and everything is happy.  However, when a Yahoo user logs out of his desktop Yahoo client and into the Yahoo Messenger client on his Blackberry, the Yahoo user can see Lync user&#039;s presence but my Lync users show the Yahoo user offline and messages no longer flow either way.  Logically, I would think the Yahoo Mobile client for Blackberry doesn&#039;t support communicating with Lync so I started some testing and this is what I have found.
 
I tried this same thing with Yahoo Messenger clients for both IPhone and Droid.  This is where it gets really strange.
 
IPhone - Lync users could see Yahoo user presence and receive IMs from Yahoo user, but Yahoo user cannot see Lync user&#039;s presence and cannot receive IMs from Lync.
 
Droid - Presence flows both ways, Lync user receives IMs from Yahoo but Yahoo user does not receive IMs from Lync.
 
This same thing is happening when logging into Live Messenger mobile client as well.  I haven&#039;t tried Google Talk as I do not have an XMPP gateway deployed.
 
Is anybody else running into this?  I&#039;ve had a consultant talkng to both Microsoft and Yahoo about this and they each keep pointing fingers at each other.  This is not a Blackberry problem as the issue is not just showing up on their platform.  My consultant also has a hosted Lync provider and they are having the same issue.  There has got to be a fix out there for this.

Brian]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kevin,</p>
<p>I posted this on the Technet forum for Presence and IM in Lync but thought I would run it by you to see if you&#8217;ve ever heard of it happening to anyone else.  Thanks for any insight you can provide.</p>
<p>I have a very odd situation I am looking for some guidance on.  We have PIC licensing for Lync and federation is established with Yahoo and Live Messenger and it works fine for the most part.  Our Lync users have outside customers they communicate with over IM.  These customers mostly use Yahoo Messenger.  When the outside customers (I&#8217;ll refer to them as Yahoo users from this point forward) are logged into Yahoo Messenger on their desktops, messages and presence flow both ways and everything is happy.  However, when a Yahoo user logs out of his desktop Yahoo client and into the Yahoo Messenger client on his Blackberry, the Yahoo user can see Lync user&#8217;s presence but my Lync users show the Yahoo user offline and messages no longer flow either way.  Logically, I would think the Yahoo Mobile client for Blackberry doesn&#8217;t support communicating with Lync so I started some testing and this is what I have found.</p>
<p>I tried this same thing with Yahoo Messenger clients for both IPhone and Droid.  This is where it gets really strange.</p>
<p>IPhone &#8211; Lync users could see Yahoo user presence and receive IMs from Yahoo user, but Yahoo user cannot see Lync user&#8217;s presence and cannot receive IMs from Lync.</p>
<p>Droid &#8211; Presence flows both ways, Lync user receives IMs from Yahoo but Yahoo user does not receive IMs from Lync.</p>
<p>This same thing is happening when logging into Live Messenger mobile client as well.  I haven&#8217;t tried Google Talk as I do not have an XMPP gateway deployed.</p>
<p>Is anybody else running into this?  I&#8217;ve had a consultant talkng to both Microsoft and Yahoo about this and they each keep pointing fingers at each other.  This is not a Blackberry problem as the issue is not just showing up on their platform.  My consultant also has a hosted Lync provider and they are having the same issue.  There has got to be a fix out there for this.</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Few Words on Federation by Louise Aalto</title>
		<link>http://ocsguy.com/2011/04/20/a-few-words-on-federation/#comment-3239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louise Aalto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocsguy.com/?p=783#comment-3239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have Lync2010 pilot up and running, have merged our OCS2007 topology into Lync2010.  Have mobility installed and running.  We currently have federations with 40 companies, many added a long time ago.  We don&#039;t know if any of the federated partners are running OCS2005 or OCS2007/2007R2.  When we move federation from the legacy OCS2007 edge server to Lync2010 we don&#039;t want to break the existing federations.  Will Lync2010 federation work with both OCS2005 and OCS2007/OCS2007R2.  I thought I read somewhere that Lync2010 won&#039;t work with OCS2005 is that true?  Many thanks.  Louise Aalto]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have Lync2010 pilot up and running, have merged our OCS2007 topology into Lync2010.  Have mobility installed and running.  We currently have federations with 40 companies, many added a long time ago.  We don&#8217;t know if any of the federated partners are running OCS2005 or OCS2007/2007R2.  When we move federation from the legacy OCS2007 edge server to Lync2010 we don&#8217;t want to break the existing federations.  Will Lync2010 federation work with both OCS2005 and OCS2007/OCS2007R2.  I thought I read somewhere that Lync2010 won&#8217;t work with OCS2005 is that true?  Many thanks.  Louise Aalto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Script Center by Kevin Peters</title>
		<link>http://ocsguy.com/script-center/#comment-3230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Peters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocsguy.com/?page_id=863#comment-3230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff, Again thanks for the feedback!  If you need any assistance modifying this one please let me know (sounds like you&#039;ve got it though).  Also, if there are other tasks you&#039;d like to see scripts for let me know.  I have a number of other ones I haven&#039;t shared yet, mostly because of the lack of feedback and being short on time to write the read me&#039;s.  But I have had over 1000 downloads of the scripts, so I guess they are at least getting used.

Thanks!

-kp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, Again thanks for the feedback!  If you need any assistance modifying this one please let me know (sounds like you&#8217;ve got it though).  Also, if there are other tasks you&#8217;d like to see scripts for let me know.  I have a number of other ones I haven&#8217;t shared yet, mostly because of the lack of feedback and being short on time to write the read me&#8217;s.  But I have had over 1000 downloads of the scripts, so I guess they are at least getting used.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>-kp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Script Center by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://ocsguy.com/script-center/#comment-3229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocsguy.com/?page_id=863#comment-3229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are absolutely correct Kevin. In my organization though our bulk uploads of analog devices invlove maybe only 1 or 2 phones.  If i had 30+  I would not see the need for a pause.  I am using the script mainly for standardization as we have over 200 sites.  I got it working without any problems. Good Job !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely correct Kevin. In my organization though our bulk uploads of analog devices invlove maybe only 1 or 2 phones.  If i had 30+  I would not see the need for a pause.  I am using the script mainly for standardization as we have over 200 sites.  I got it working without any problems. Good Job !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Kevin Peters</title>
		<link>http://ocsguy.com/about/#comment-3228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Peters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tommy, I can&#039;t answer the why question, although I have opinions on it.  I can say that if your edge goes down (whether its DNSLB or HLB) the client is still connecticting to just that AV edge IP and will loose the call.   

-kp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tommy, I can&#8217;t answer the why question, although I have opinions on it.  I can say that if your edge goes down (whether its DNSLB or HLB) the client is still connecticting to just that AV edge IP and will loose the call.   </p>
<p>-kp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Script Center by Kevin Peters</title>
		<link>http://ocsguy.com/script-center/#comment-3227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Peters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocsguy.com/?page_id=863#comment-3227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jeff,

Definitely could easily add the dial plan if needed, just wasn&#039;t something I did with the script.  As far as the sleep, from my testing, the loop to create devices being separated from the loop to assign voice policy was enough time for everything to happen. If that isn&#039;t the case than adding the sleep at line 38 would do the trick.

Thanks for the feedback!

-Kevin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff,</p>
<p>Definitely could easily add the dial plan if needed, just wasn&#8217;t something I did with the script.  As far as the sleep, from my testing, the loop to create devices being separated from the loop to assign voice policy was enough time for everything to happen. If that isn&#8217;t the case than adding the sleep at line 38 would do the trick.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback!</p>
<p>-Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Script Center by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://ocsguy.com/script-center/#comment-3226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ocsguy.com/?page_id=863#comment-3226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why no command to assign to a dial plan?  Also,  you should insert a sleep 120 to allow the phone creation to get into SQL PRIOR to assigning it to a voice policy and dial plan.  Without the sleep 120 the voice policy does not get applied because they phone is not in sql yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why no command to assign to a dial plan?  Also,  you should insert a sleep 120 to allow the phone creation to get into SQL PRIOR to assigning it to a voice policy and dial plan.  Without the sleep 120 the voice policy does not get applied because they phone is not in sql yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Tommy Boucher</title>
		<link>http://ocsguy.com/about/#comment-3225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tommy Boucher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, if you are using Lync Server 2010 as PBX for Enterprise Voice, your External User (Home Office) won&#039;t have any Call Resilency, right?

Why Microsoft aren&#039;t doing it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if you are using Lync Server 2010 as PBX for Enterprise Voice, your External User (Home Office) won&#8217;t have any Call Resilency, right?</p>
<p>Why Microsoft aren&#8217;t doing it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

